So you are one of those Christians?

i met a man at the community College once. He found out I was a minister. He said with some disdain in his voice, “So  you’re one of those Christians?”

I knew immediately what he was asking. He equated Christianity with those who are narrow-minded, bigoted,politically conservative, anti gay, anti science, closed minded people who have checked their brains at the door of their belief systems. To him  that was the only kind of Christian there was.

Well I’m not one of those kind of Christians. I have sometimes thought about trying to be called something else; like a follower of Jesus.  I am ashamed of being classified as one of those described above.

But I don’t want to be exclusive. Even if some of those Christians are. We are all Christians. I just want let the world know that I am not narrow minded, bigoted, politically conservative, anti gay, anti science, and pro gun. But I am a Christian.  And from my way of looking at it, my views are closer to the views that Jesus professed than the other kind.

Still, I don’t want to exclude them because of a difference of beliefs. I will simply pray that the Holy Spirit will continue to lead us all into all truth. That means I will stay open to change and hope that the other variety of Christians will do the same. Whether you are one of “those” Christians or some other kind, we are all doing our best to follow Jesus.

In the mean time, please don’t lump us all into one category.


On our 27th anniversary I thought of a joke about a couple who had been married 60 years. They were in pretty good shape except that their hearing was almost gone. At the party, the husband stood and raised his glass toward his bride and said, ‘After 60 years you are tried and true.” To which his wife responded by standing and saying to her husband, “And after 60 years, I am tired of you too!”

I’m not tired of Prudy. I have a hard time  understanding how she is not tired of me.

Random thoughts

The picture at the top of my blog was taken by my wife from the top of Mauna  Kea on big island of Hawaii.   You can see the top of Mauna Loa jutting out over the top of the clouds.

I like to think of it as a visual parable of theology. We can study our whole lives and never know most of the truth. Our clearest concept of God is still clouded in mystery.

It is still important for us to study and think and pray about things spiritual. But I have to remind myself once in a while that I will never know the whole story or see the whole picture in thins life. And I am OK with that. In fact, I am glad that there is still mystery. We have been shown what we need to know by a loving God who does not expect us to see the totality of God or God’s truth.

it’s another reason for righteous anger at those who claim to know the whole truth of God enough to kill people who disagree with them. I think if God were to send just one message today it would be, “STOP KILLING PEOPLE; ESPECIALLY KILLING THEM IN MY NAME! JUST STOP IT.” This includes ISIS and the KKK and the kid who murdered people in Charleston and anybody who believes that hate is a good motive for anything; especially the taking of another human life.

Since none of us can see the whole mountain clearly, we need to live out our faith and let our neighbor do the same with t heir faith or even their lack of faith. God will sort it all out someday. We don’t have to.


Moving is a giant pain. In the past we would have friends gather and help us load and unload a rented truck. for the price of pizza and beer and the promise to help them move when they needed us. Then the churches would pay for professional movers. But now it’s all us. And our friends are all like us; too old and decrepit to be lifting heavy things.

It feels like wilderness time. The boxes and mess around us and the pictures off the walls make it feel like wilderness time.

To make it ever worse, my back pain is severe and persistent. Surgery will take place as soon as we relocate. So Prudy has had to do most of the packing herself.  We have paid crews who will load and unload the truck. That helps.

But if you think about it, say a little prayer for us until we are once again home.


A minister was visiting a farmer. He came up behind the farmer just as he started a vicious segment of foul language.  Then he saw the preacher and he said, “Sorry Reverend. I cuss a little and you pray a little and God knows neither of us means anything by it.”

movies as parables

I’m a big movie fan.  I generally like all genres of film except the ones that are about blowing stuff up and wrecking cars and shooting people. I’m not against having some of that in the movie, but there are too many movies like that that have no substance.

Turner Classic Movies are great because they didn’t have the special effects to hide behind. So there had to be a story.

I also like movies that have a meaning that may not be immediately detected.  I have found that movies can be great illustrations for sermons if you are looking for lessons in what are otherwise “secular” movies. Here are two short examples:


This beloved children’s classic was MGM’s attempt to compete with the success that Disney was having with films for children. But the story by Frank Baum is deceptive.  Her are a few scenes to think about.

The Wizard, powerful and mysterious is a symbol for God. But when Toto pulls back the curtain, the Wiz is a common man who got lost and establish power over a city with smoke and trickery. He has no power beyond the people’s false belief that he is all wise and all powerful.

When he gives out the gifts to the pilgrims who have risked much to see him, he really does not give them anything that they didn’t already have. ( See the song, “Tin Man” by America)  All of the things that they desired, wisdom, compassion and courage were already theirs. They only needed to discover those “gifts.”

I don’t want to ruin the movie that generations of children have enjoyed. It can still be viewed as a children’s classic. All kinds see are witches and flying monkeys and a happy ending. But if you look a little deeper, you see a manifesto for humanism. God is a fake perpetrated by people’s fears. And everything good in the world is to be discovered within with no need for a god.


This movie is about a grumpy bigoted old widower played by Clint Eastwood. He hates the fact that his neighborhood is now populated by Asian families. The ones who move next door to him are especially irritating to him although they continue to be nice to him.

Gradually Walt gets to know them and begins to care about them in spite of his preconceived bias. This family is  being terrorized by a gang of thugs who do everything they can to make life miserable for this family. After they brutally rape the daughter, Walt decides to act. We expect him to go and gun down the bad guys. But instead he taunts them into shooting and killing him. He knows that they will go to prison and the family that he once thought of as “gooks” will not be safe. The final scene shows Walt laying on the sidewalk while the thugs are arrested. His arms are stretched out as if on a cross.

A figure who dies for the ones he cares about. Does that ring any bells for Christians? This is for sure a secular film. But there is a powerful spiritual image in it that is unmistakable for those who are paying attention.

Preachers are wise to look for illustrations in things that don’t seem religious at all. There are burning bushes all around us.


A man says to his wife, “When we argue, you never get mad. How do you do that?” She says,  “When I get mad at you, I just clean the toilet.”  ” How does that help?” the husband replies. “I use  your toothbrush.”

What is a preacher to do with politics?

I bristle at preachers who use the pulpit to tell people who to vote for. The pulpit is not a place for partisan political opinions.

But what is a preacher to do when the entire country is talking about the events in Virginia and other places around the country and the responses of our President?

I guess you could ignore it. You could say nothing about what all of the people in the congregation are thinking about. But silence is an ally of evil.

You realize that people are not interested in the preacher’s opinion. They are searching for truth in a world where truth is beginning to have little meaning. The math teacher says that two plus two equals four. And some of the students say, “That’s just your opinion.”

The answer is to preach what the Bible tells us. That is a truth that we will not compromise. We may have disagreements as to how the Bible is interpreted. But if you are afraid to preach Biblical truth in love, then you should not be in the pulpit. When there is a moral crisis the preacher is not free to ignore it. Few would claim that a moral crisis now exists in our country.

So it would be wrong to call for the impeachment of Donald Trump. And it would be wrong to condemn the responses of one party or the other. It is imperative that we preach truths like the value and dignity of every human being. We should preach truths like Jesus saying that we should love our neighbors without limits or restrictions. Love your neighbor; your black neighbor, your Muslim neighbor, your Jewish neighbor, your gay neighbor. LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR! The Biblical truth is that there can be no “them” and “us,” We are all us.

If the President cannot act on and speak that truth then it is appropriate to call him on it; not because of your political stance, but because of Biblical truth.

As followers of Christ, we must stand up and speak the truth. Hate and division and violence are wrong. That is not a political view. It is a Biblical view.

Some of the Neo-Nazis and and the KKK claim to be Christians. It is not our place to judge them. But it is our responsibility to say that their behavior is anti-Christian.

I for one will continue to pray for them. I will pray that God’s Spirit will open the eyes of their hearts to see the error of their ways. I will continue to pray for the President, that he too will seek the wisdom of Jesus and speak and act accordingly. As repugnant as we may find them, they are also children of God. If there is judging to do, that will be God’s work, not ours.

It’s tricky these days to not sound politically partisan in the pulpit. But if you preach Biblical truth, you will be on solid ground. Then ask them to pray for our nation and our world, that we may one day put hatred aside and find the peace that is beyond understanding.


Sometimes it is hard to laugh.

How to Listen to a Sermon

I have written an outline about how I write a sermon. So I thought it might be helpful to write a brief guide on how to LISTEN to a sermon.

I would not fill this out until the sermon is finished. Then before too much time goes by, answer these questions:

Did the beginning of the sermon let you know where the preacher was headed?

Could you hear and understand the words without too much strain? Did the preachers voice sound like his or her normal voice?

What illustrations were used and how did they help your understanding of the point being made?

Was the sermon true to the text? That is, was the sermon really about the scripture read?

Did the sermon hold your attention throughout?

Was the preacher trying to inspire  you, inform you, encourage you or scold you?

Was any humor used in an appropriate way?

Can you tell what the point of the sermon was in one or two sentences? Was it focused?

How did the sermon make you feel?

Was anything said in in the sermon that you did not already know?

Give the sermon a grade as to how it impacted you.



A few stupid things heard on TV news.

The long drawn out rubber workers strike ends

This album was recorded before Michael Jackson died.

HEADLINE:  Union, School Board butt heads.

Finally, the weather man reported that the snow fall had caused some damage but, “there were no serious fatalities!”

Political essay (sort of)

I think it’s time I put my cards on the table about an issue that is dividing the nation. It is about Donald Trump, so brace yourself.

This is not something that I would ever say from the pulpit. I  believe that using the pulpit for partisan politics is an abuse of that sacred responsibility to preach the gospel.

My politics leans left although I reject the extremes of both the left and the right.   So call me a moderate by choice, not by default. I have voted for Democrats and  Republicans in my life time.  And although I disagreed with many of the policies of George W. Bush, I never believed that he was an evil man.  And I was outraged at the moral decay seen in the person of Bill Clinton.

But Trump is different. He has made me re-examine the gospel because I didn’t think my feelings about him were in sync with the Lord I follow.

So I am sorry in advance if I offend you. But this is really more about my own spiritual struggle than it is about politics.


Donald  Trump pisses me off. I wish I had a more polite way of saying that, but it is the most accurate verb I could come up with.  I know I am not alone in this feeling.  Most of the time, I reject absolutes when it comes to human beings. It is rare that someone is totally good or totally evil. But Trump may be the exception.

He is narcissistic and ego maniacal. He lies habitually. He does not care about the planet or any of the people on it. He cares only about himself. He has cheated hard working people out of what he owes them. He demeans and insults people like a fifth grader. He is a serial abuser of women. He is a xenophobic racist who could not care less about the least of these our brothers and sisters. The list goes on. I cannot think of one positive thing to say about the man. He just pisses me off.

It feels good to say that. It feels righteous. Jesus got mad at people like Donald Trump in the Bible.  He expressed anger at the Pharisees and the Chief Priests and the money changers in the Temple. If I could only stop there with those stories, I could revel in my anger at Trump.

But no; I had to go and read the thirteenth chapter of the gospel of John. Jesus washes the feet of the disciples. He was teaching them what love truly meant. He performed the lowliest and most disgusting task to teach them to love and honor each other.

I get that. But it is easy to forget that Judas Iscariot was on the ones who had his feel washed by Jesus that night.  And it wasn’t like Jesus didn’t already know what Judas was planning. Jesus bends down and washes his feet. Every disciple, then and now is imperfect. None of them and none of us, including me are absolutely good. And even old Judas was not exempt from the loving service that Jesus rendered.

Then Jesus offers one of his most difficult challenges to all who would follow him. “You also should do as I have done to to you.”

And there I was enjoying my righteous judgment of Donald Trump. I was enjoying my wrath toward him. And Jesus had to go and spoil my fun. But Trump pisses me off Jesus! I disagree with almost every position he holds and every abuse of power he demonstrates his lack of caring with executive orders and proposed laws that will hurt and in some cases kill people; some of those people I know. He seems sometimes to be the model of exactly what Jesus would NOT want us to be.

Yet, there is Jesus with that dirty towel around his waist and that look in his eyes that say love is unconditional. Then he reminds me that everyone, EVERYONE is created in the image of God. And he asks me, “Would you wash Donald Trump’s feet?”

I don’t know how to answer that.

How I Write a Sermon Part Three


Now that I have an outline that has developed as a result of prayer and serious study, I am ready to write the first draft of my sermon.  While all of the pieces so far have taken days and have been interrupted by other demands in life, I try to write the sermon in one sitting.  If I don’t, I lose the flow of where it is headed.

Sometimes I delete entire paragraphs because I realize that they don’t fit with the theme. Sometimes I am inspired by illustrations that come to mind, or current events. I like to think of the sermon as a structure. The illustrations are windows that let us see within the structure.

It is also very helpful to not make all of the illustrations about church. I try to keep in mind that many of the listeners spend 167 hours outside of the church and one inside. The illustrations have to have something to do with where they live.

That is what it is so important that the preacher be a part of the community to which she preaches. Some wise old pastor said, “The preacher should drink out of them same well as the members of  his church,”  It is harder for me to preach to a group of strangers, Invariably those sermons are more generic and less personal and less helpful.

After I finish a first draft, usually on Wednesday, I let it sit for a day. Then I read it as a whole and get a sense of what it needs to be a stronger message.  My re-wires are usually not an entire new script. They are just changes made in parts that need improvement. I try to remember that the sermon is a spoken medium instead of a written one.  A sermon can read well, but not sound the same. Early in my career, I would go to the church on Saturday night and practice preach my sermon to an empty sanctuary. I don’t do that anymore. I just preach it to myself in my office. This has led to more than one person expressing concern. “The pastor is in his office talking to himself.”

It is important to be heard. I try to “play to the back pew” even when there is a sound system working. I let the tech people adjust to my voice rather than the other way around. It is important to be clear with you words. Whispering for effect works sometimes, but usually leaves people asking, “What did he say?”

I love to come back to some point made earlier in the sermon as I near the finish. That seems to give the sermon continuity. Sometimes I like to end the sermon with a question, or an unfinished statement. Let the congregation do some of the work of interpretation.

Well, that’s how I do it. But I always tell student pastors to find their own style. Don’t try to preach like Fred Craddock or James Forbes or Tom Long or even Rick Sweeney. Be yourself. Don’t develop a “pulpit voice” It will just sound phony, believe me. And don’t be afraid to be creative. Try different styles. Do some story telling. Walk away from the pulpit when you think that will help deliver a point in the sermon. Don’t read your sermon.  It is OK to take notes into the pulpit, but if you just read it, the congregation will miss eye contact with you and feel like you were not really talking to them.

Part of preaching is a science that you must learn from experience. And some of it is a gift that God has given you. Don’t waste the gift by failing to do the work.


The little boy asked his mom if all of the angels are women. The mom says, “No dear, why do you ask?” The little boy said, ‘Well in the pictures none of the angels have beards.” And mom answered, “That’s because all of the men in heaven got there by a close shave.”



OK, back to homiletics. That is the official name of the study of preaching.

In Part One, we had covered the work of selecting, and reading and researching the text or passage for that sermon. Now we have to use the information we have gathered to create a statement of synthesis and and outline of the sermon.

Part B is a brief statement that tells what the sermon is about.  It must follow the research I have already done. It can be no more than a sentence or two.  It states THE point of the sermon. Too many sermons are all over the place. But it lacks focus.  I like to ask someone what the sermon was about. Then I can see if that fits my summary statement in Part B. I had a professor once say that every sermon should have at least one point. That seems like it should be obvious. But there are too many sermons that leave you wondering what it was about. Most of the time that is because the preacher did not work hard enough on his synthesis statement.

It’s a little strange that this is the shortest part of the process on paper. But in many ways it is the most difficult part.  It must be informed by the exegesis that you have created. Let’s look at that word. Exegesis means “drawing out.” All of the study I do is for the purpose of drawing out the meaning of the text. I try very hard not to preaching some idea that I have and then find a Bible passage that supports that idea. To me,that is not preaching.  A sermon is a preacher helping the listeners hear the message that the Bible is presenting.

Once I have written a solid Part B, my thesis statement, I am ready to begin to write an outline.  There is no magic number of sub-points to a sermon. I try to let the text inform me about how the message should flow. In the outline it is time to take all of the material  I have found and build a kind of skeleton for the sermon. While I am doing this, I think about where the major transitions will be and the order in which I want to present the material. I try to remind myself that you cannot and should not try to preach the whole Bible in one sermon.  The outline has to stick to the main them that I have written in Part B.

I don’t worry about how long the sermons will be.  Some of that is the style I have developed over the years.  Mine are usually somewhere between 15 and 20 minutes.  A professor was asked  how long one should preach. He said,”preach until you are finished and then for God’s sake, stop. There is nothing worse for the kingdom of God than to bore s group of people for a long time.  While I am doing the outline, I think about where the illustrations will fit. Some do not. It is a mistake to use a story just because you think it’s great if it doesn’t fit into the theme of the sermon. Save it for another time.

I do a strange little thing while creating my outline. I highlight the various things I have found and the illustrations I have thought of. I color code them with different colored highlighters. This helps me visualize the flow of the sermon and makes it easier for me to write the actual sermon.  My kids always thought it was funny that I “color”my sermons. I told them it was therapy for old people. Next time we will finish the sermon writing process. Then I will be including some sermons for your amusement.



The preacher was giving a children’s sermon in the fall. He wanted to talk about being prepared for the future.  He said, “Boys and girls, what is it that is gray and has a bushy tail and climbs trees?” One little guy answered, “I know the right answer is always supposed to be Jesus, but that sure sounds like a squirrel to me.”

A Christmas Story in July

After I read my last post, I realized that it would not be very interesting to those of you who don’t write sermons. So today, I am going to share a true story. This really happened.  So here is a little Christmas cheer in July. Sometimes funny things happen in church and I think that is a good thing. Ann Lamott called laughter “carbonated holiness.” I will post part two of how I write a sermon later.

Sometimes December 25 falls on a Sunday. Most of the churches I have served have two or even three services on Christmas Eve. But when Christmas day happens to be on a Sunday we have worship services again on Sunday morning.

As usual, attendance is pretty low when that happens. We decided to have an informal service. I invited everyone to come to church in their pajamas. One woman said she didn’t wear pajamas. And while that might have improved attendance, she just stayed home.

A woman who was near or beyond 70 asked me if her mother could play the piano during that service.  I thought, “How old must mother be?” But I said yes figuring there wouldn’t be very many people there anyway.

She showed up and she was darling.  The woman helped her mom to the piano and she began to play.  She started out with Hark the Herald Angels Sing. Then she moved into Away in the Manger and Silent Night.  She played in a kind of honky-tonk style, but it was nice. Then she started into a lively version of Jingle Bells which is not a hymn, but what the heck. Then she started to play Santa Baby; honest to God. I am pretty sure that Santa Baby had never been played as part of a worship service before. I could almost hear those old Presbyterians out in the cemetery rolling in their graves.  Someone once said that a Presbyterian was someone who was upset that someone somewhere in the world was having fun. That did not define my congregation there.

The daughter was embarrassed and she told her mom to stop. But it turns out mother was nearly deaf. Her daughter ran up to the piano and yelled into her ear to stop. People were trying not to laugh, but it was too funny to hold it in. It’s OK, mom couldn’t hear the laughter anyway.

Later in the service the 90+ year old woman played a duet with her great-grand daughter. It was lovely and touching. You never know what surprises the Spirit has in store.  People afterward said it was the best Christmas Day service they had ever attended.


Four surgeons were discussing the easiest patients to operate on. The first said it was accountants because everything in them was numbered. The second said it was electricians because every part was color coded. the third surgeon said he thought it was librarians because everything was in alphabetical order. But the fourth surgeon topped them all. He said, “The easiest people to operate on are politicians. There are no guts, no spine, no heart, no brain and the head and the butt are interchangeable.”

How I write a sermon

Do people in the pews of churches ever wonder how the preacher creates the sermons they listen to?

In case anyone is interested today I will begin a three part blog on the process I use. This is not universal to all preachers. The only one I know is my own.

  1. Reading the passage
  2. Part A: The research
  3. Part B: The point
  4. Creating an outline
  5. Writing a first draft
  6. Delivery



It may seem like a no-brainer. You have to read the passage before you can deliver a sermon based on it.  But it is more involved than it seems. First there is the selection of the passage,called a text for that sermon. i generally use the lectionary. That is a list of Biblical passages for each Sunday. There are usually at least four texts listed.  I read them all and determine which one is the most relevant to the congregation I am speaking to. Sometimes I choose a text that is not one of the lectionary lessons. Some preachers never follow the lectionary. There is no right or wrong way to choose. But there is a danger in choosing your own passage. You may be tempted to tell the listeners what you think with a passage from the Bible to back you up. To me, that is not preaching. That is a lecture with the Bible as a pretext. But that’s just me.

Once I have selected a passage, the next step is to read it prayerfully. I desperately need God’s guidance to deliver a message to God’s people. Sure it goes through the filters of my life and my perspective, but it must be the text that informs me as to what I  will say; not the only way around.

Then I read it again. This time I make a list of the characters and the verbs. I begin to ask myself the Who What When Where and Why questions. I jot these questions down. If this is a familiar passage that I have preached before, it is important for me to try and see the text anew; like I have never read it before. Now, with one more prayer, it is time to start doing the hard work of research.



There are many books called commentaries. These are written by scholars about one of the books of the Bible.  They contain important information about the passage you are preaching. They tell you if there are language issues to be aware of. For instance in Genesis 29 the writer talks about Leah’s eyes. The Bible I use translates it as lovely eyes.  Other translations call them weak eyes or dull eyes. There is a footnote in my version that tells me that the Hebrew meaning of the word is unclear. No kidding! Commentaries also tell you if there are text issues. Read the end of Mark’s Gospel. If your Bible is like mine you will have three different versions of the ending. Which one is closest to the original and why would there be more than one? That is a text issue. the commentaries then follow the text verse by verse giving valuable background information about the setting and the meaning of the terms used.

I usually try to have have four sources. Some are more scholarly than others. Some try to help with the transition to themes. Some of my favorites are Feasting on the Word, The New Interpreters Bible, The Interpretation Series and a  on-line commentary edited by Walter Brueggemann. I also use the Barclay series sometimes. It is not as academic as the others, but it is still very helpful. I also use specific work for some texts. I cannot preach one of the parables without referring to Ken Bailey’s work.

I take notes as I do this research.  A skill that I have developed with time is to write only the significant things about the text and leave out the trivial. This Part A will inform the development of Part B which we will examine next time.



The little boy was sitting in church during the sermon. He said to his dad, “What does it mean when the preacher looks at his watch?” His father responded, “Not a thing, son, not a thing,”